I love stories, and in particular, teen stories. But I’m not so sure that there’s a story in the fact that there are teen stories. Follow? In recent years it seems like every month or so there is a new article out dissecting “trends” in ya lit. And while I love talking about ya lit as much as any other fan, I’m finding it a bit tiring. I don’t mean to sound so down on Charles McGrath’s February 20th article in the New York Times, “Teenage Wastelands.” I was eager to read it and agreed with many of his points, though I thought overall he was a bit condescending. But you know what always gets me about the trend articles? I always feel a little bit bad for the books published before it was a trend. I think we can all agree that Harry Potter and the Sorceror’s Stone was not the very first book for kids that involved magical fantasy. And Hunger Games was not the very first book that was dystopian. And yet so often as soon as a “trend” is identified it’s as if a genre or an idea never existed before (I happen to believe that in fashion and fiction there is very little that is 100% never thought of before). I was pleased that in his article McGrath actually does point to Shirley Jackson’s The Lottery when he discusses Hunger Games.
What do you think? Does the article give current ya fiction a fair shake?
–Sarah Debraski, currently reading Leviathan by Scott Westerfeld
You may also like:
Latest posts by Sarah Debraski (see all)
- I Do? They Don’t: Young Marriage in YA Literature - November 1, 2013
- That Was Then This is Now: That’s My Baby - October 3, 2013
- That Was Then, This Is Now: Pennington’s Last Term - June 4, 2013